boxplot and statistical analysis of fold change between groups (two-sample t test) Search Results


boxplot and statistical analysis of fold change between groups (two-sample t test)  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc boxplot and statistical analysis of fold change between groups (two-sample t test)
Boxplot And Statistical Analysis Of Fold Change Between Groups (Two Sample T Test), supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/boxplot and statistical analysis of fold change between groups (two-sample t test)/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
boxplot and statistical analysis of fold change between groups (two-sample t test) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
boxplot and statistical analysis  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc boxplot and statistical analysis
A) RNA expression of LDHA and LDHB in BrM2 vs parental cells. LDHA: 1.5-fold, p=0.3, LDHB: 1.1-fold, p=0.3. Data are represented as mean ± SD. B) RNA expression of LDHA and LDHB in LM2 vs parental cells. LDHA: .9-fold, p=0.7. LDHB: 1.4-fold, p=0.02. Data are represented as mean ± SD. C) <t>Boxplot</t> of ratio of LDH genes (sum of LDHA and LDHB) to PDH genes (sum of PDHA1 and PDHA2) in cell lines. Fold change relative to parental: BrM2: 1.2-fold, p=0.2, LM2: 1.5-fold, p=0.007. Fold change LM2/BrM2: 1.3-fold, p=0.03. D) Boxplot of ratio of LDH genes to PDH genes in patient tumors from The Metastatic Breast Cancer Project. The “Lung” classification includes all tumors that had lung metastases, “Brain” classification includes all tumors that had brain/CNS metastases, and “Other” classification contains tumors that had metastases other than to the lung or brain/CNS. Fold change lung/other: 1.6-fold, p=0.02. See also Fig S5.
Boxplot And Statistical Analysis, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/boxplot and statistical analysis/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
boxplot and statistical analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
two-sample t-test boxplot  (Minitab Inc)
90
Minitab Inc two-sample t-test boxplot
A) RNA expression of LDHA and LDHB in BrM2 vs parental cells. LDHA: 1.5-fold, p=0.3, LDHB: 1.1-fold, p=0.3. Data are represented as mean ± SD. B) RNA expression of LDHA and LDHB in LM2 vs parental cells. LDHA: .9-fold, p=0.7. LDHB: 1.4-fold, p=0.02. Data are represented as mean ± SD. C) <t>Boxplot</t> of ratio of LDH genes (sum of LDHA and LDHB) to PDH genes (sum of PDHA1 and PDHA2) in cell lines. Fold change relative to parental: BrM2: 1.2-fold, p=0.2, LM2: 1.5-fold, p=0.007. Fold change LM2/BrM2: 1.3-fold, p=0.03. D) Boxplot of ratio of LDH genes to PDH genes in patient tumors from The Metastatic Breast Cancer Project. The “Lung” classification includes all tumors that had lung metastases, “Brain” classification includes all tumors that had brain/CNS metastases, and “Other” classification contains tumors that had metastases other than to the lung or brain/CNS. Fold change lung/other: 1.6-fold, p=0.02. See also Fig S5.
Two Sample T Test Boxplot, supplied by Minitab Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/two-sample t-test boxplot/product/Minitab Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
two-sample t-test boxplot - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
illumina spike-in dataset  (Illumina Inc)
90
Illumina Inc illumina spike-in dataset
Using the Illumina detection method, frequency and percent of detection calls by spike-in concentration for the <t> Illumina spike-in </t> dataset using Illumina recommended thresholds of α = 0.01 and α = 0.05
Illumina Spike In Dataset, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/illumina spike-in dataset/product/Illumina Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
illumina spike-in dataset - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
matlab version r2022b  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc matlab version r2022b
Using the Illumina detection method, frequency and percent of detection calls by spike-in concentration for the <t> Illumina spike-in </t> dataset using Illumina recommended thresholds of α = 0.01 and α = 0.05
Matlab Version R2022b, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab version r2022b/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab version r2022b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
originpro 2021  (OriginLab corp)
90
OriginLab corp originpro 2021
Using the Illumina detection method, frequency and percent of detection calls by spike-in concentration for the <t> Illumina spike-in </t> dataset using Illumina recommended thresholds of α = 0.01 and α = 0.05
Originpro 2021, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/originpro 2021/product/OriginLab corp
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
originpro 2021 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


A) RNA expression of LDHA and LDHB in BrM2 vs parental cells. LDHA: 1.5-fold, p=0.3, LDHB: 1.1-fold, p=0.3. Data are represented as mean ± SD. B) RNA expression of LDHA and LDHB in LM2 vs parental cells. LDHA: .9-fold, p=0.7. LDHB: 1.4-fold, p=0.02. Data are represented as mean ± SD. C) Boxplot of ratio of LDH genes (sum of LDHA and LDHB) to PDH genes (sum of PDHA1 and PDHA2) in cell lines. Fold change relative to parental: BrM2: 1.2-fold, p=0.2, LM2: 1.5-fold, p=0.007. Fold change LM2/BrM2: 1.3-fold, p=0.03. D) Boxplot of ratio of LDH genes to PDH genes in patient tumors from The Metastatic Breast Cancer Project. The “Lung” classification includes all tumors that had lung metastases, “Brain” classification includes all tumors that had brain/CNS metastases, and “Other” classification contains tumors that had metastases other than to the lung or brain/CNS. Fold change lung/other: 1.6-fold, p=0.02. See also Fig S5.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Divergent use of metabolic fluxes in breast cancer metastasis

doi: 10.1101/2020.08.03.234468

Figure Lengend Snippet: A) RNA expression of LDHA and LDHB in BrM2 vs parental cells. LDHA: 1.5-fold, p=0.3, LDHB: 1.1-fold, p=0.3. Data are represented as mean ± SD. B) RNA expression of LDHA and LDHB in LM2 vs parental cells. LDHA: .9-fold, p=0.7. LDHB: 1.4-fold, p=0.02. Data are represented as mean ± SD. C) Boxplot of ratio of LDH genes (sum of LDHA and LDHB) to PDH genes (sum of PDHA1 and PDHA2) in cell lines. Fold change relative to parental: BrM2: 1.2-fold, p=0.2, LM2: 1.5-fold, p=0.007. Fold change LM2/BrM2: 1.3-fold, p=0.03. D) Boxplot of ratio of LDH genes to PDH genes in patient tumors from The Metastatic Breast Cancer Project. The “Lung” classification includes all tumors that had lung metastases, “Brain” classification includes all tumors that had brain/CNS metastases, and “Other” classification contains tumors that had metastases other than to the lung or brain/CNS. Fold change lung/other: 1.6-fold, p=0.02. See also Fig S5.

Article Snippet: The ratio of gene expression of (LDHA+LDHB)/(PDHA1+PDHA2) was calculated for each patient; boxplot and statistical analysis of fold change between groups (two-sample t -test) was done in MATLAB.

Techniques: RNA Expression

Using the Illumina detection method, frequency and percent of detection calls by spike-in concentration for the Illumina spike-in dataset using Illumina recommended thresholds of α = 0.01 and α = 0.05

Journal: Briefings in Bioinformatics

Article Title: Detection call algorithms for high-throughput gene expression microarray data

doi: 10.1093/bib/bbp055

Figure Lengend Snippet: Using the Illumina detection method, frequency and percent of detection calls by spike-in concentration for the Illumina spike-in dataset using Illumina recommended thresholds of α = 0.01 and α = 0.05

Article Snippet: Right panel: Boxplots of P -values from two-sample t -test comparing mean bead-level expression to negative control expression by spike-in concentration for the Illumina spike-in dataset.

Techniques: Concentration Assay

When comparing bead-level intensities for each beadtype to the bead-level intensities of negative control beadtypes using a two-sample t -test, frequency and percent of detection calls by spike-in concentration for the Illumina spike-in dataset using Illumina recommended thresholds of α = 0.01 and α = 0.05

Journal: Briefings in Bioinformatics

Article Title: Detection call algorithms for high-throughput gene expression microarray data

doi: 10.1093/bib/bbp055

Figure Lengend Snippet: When comparing bead-level intensities for each beadtype to the bead-level intensities of negative control beadtypes using a two-sample t -test, frequency and percent of detection calls by spike-in concentration for the Illumina spike-in dataset using Illumina recommended thresholds of α = 0.01 and α = 0.05

Article Snippet: Right panel: Boxplots of P -values from two-sample t -test comparing mean bead-level expression to negative control expression by spike-in concentration for the Illumina spike-in dataset.

Techniques: Negative Control, Concentration Assay